Thursday, September 15, 2011

foreclosure investing


INVEST 2010 - Panel Presentation by Commerce Resources Corp. by Commerce Resources Corp. (TSXv: CCE)


You've without doubt seen all of them or study them. Glossy ads or four-color advances in publications and newspapers promising to show you all the juicy details about successful real-estate investing. And all you need to do to learn all these real property investing surface encounters chuck russo secrets is to pay a rather high sum for a one-or two-day seminar.




Often these slick property investing seminars claim that you can make smart, profitable property investments with zero money straight down (with the exception of, of training course, the significant fee you pay for the class). Now, how appealing is which? Make a benefit from real property investments you created using no money. Possible? Not likely.




Successful owning a home requires income. That's the character of almost any business or perhaps investment, especially real-estate investing. You put your money into a thing that you hope and plan will make you more money.




Unfortunately too few newbies towards the world of real estate investing think that it's the magical form of business exactly where standard company rules do not apply. Simply put, if you need to stay in real estate investing for greater than, say, a day or two, then you will have to create money to utilize and make investments.




While it may be true which buying real estate with simply no money down is simple, anyone who's even made a fundamental real estate investment (just like buying their very own home) knows there's far more involved in real-estate investing that can cost you money. For illustration, what concerning any essential repairs?




So, the number 1 rule people not used to real est investing ought to remember would be to have available cash supplies. Before you determine to actually carry out any property investing, save some money. Having just a little money within the bank when you start real property investing surface encounters chuck russo can help you make more profitable real estate investments in rental properties, for example.




When property investing inside rental properties, you'll want every single child select simply qualified tenants. If you might have no cash flow when property investing within rental qualities, you might be pressured to take a less qualified tenant since you need somebody to cover you money to be able to take treatment of repairs or attorney fees.




For almost any real est investing, meaning leasing properties or perhaps properties you purchase to sell, having cash reserved can allow you to ask for a higher cost. You can request a higher price from your investment because an individual surface encounters chuck russo won't feel financially strapped as you wait for an offer. You won't be backed into a corner and forced to accept just any offer because you desperately need the money.




Another downfall of several new to property investing is actually, well, greed. Make a profit, yes, but will not become so greedy which you ask regarding ridiculous leasing or second-hand rates on many real estate investments.




Those new to real property investing need to see property investing as a business, NOT an interest. Don't believe real estate investing is going to make you abundant overnight. What company does?




It takes about six months to figure out if property investing in for you. If you've decided in which, hey I love this, then offer yourself many years to really start making money. It often takes at minimum five years to get truly prosperous in real estate investing.




Persistence may be the key to be able to success in real estate investing. If you've decided that property investing is perfect for you, surface encounters chuck russo keep plugging away at it and the rewards will be greater than you imagined.











Warren Buffett just announced that he's making a landmark investment, $5 billion, in Bank of America.


Bank of America was facing a free-falling stock price and a number of criticisms, including that it did not have enough capital, and that its assets were not worth what it claimed.


Now thanks to Buffett, that will certainly change.


When similar investments were made in Citi and in Goldman Sachs, by Prince Alwaleed and Warren Buffett, in 1990 and 2008, respectively, the stocks experienced long term gains. 


And get this - he says he dreamt up the idea to invest in Bank of America in the bathtub on Tuesday. He liked it, so he called Moynihan on Wednesday morning. The entire story of how it happened is available in a video embedded below, as told to Becky Quick by Buffett.


The story (and the mental image) is amusing but also important - it suggests that the Obama Administration and/or the Treasury, did not have a hand in the agreement.


And to make it very clear that Treasury or Obama had no hand in the arrangement, which makes the news even better for Bank of America.


So does this - the deal is expensive for Buffett, and a good deal for Bank of America. He says in some ways, it's better than the deal he gave to Goldman Sachs in 2008.


But obviously, it's a great deal for Buffett.


Buffett's investment alone is now worth $700 million more than it was when he bought it.





(h/t Heather at VideoCafe)


It is a truism rarely acknowledged in this country: the single most important infrastructure investment we can make for the future is in education. I'm not talking about retrofitting the buildings or constructing more classrooms. No, we provide for the future by educating our young people, preparing them to become productive members of society. Study after study shows that the higher one's education level is, the higher the median income and the less likely one is to suffer unemployment.


But we're not doing that. No, in these austerity times, politicians clamor to cut services and jobs. Teachers are demonized. Vouchers are touted as the answer, when it's simply a way to privatize profits away from public schools. Hell, some GOP would be happy if we eliminate the Department of Education altogether.


A rare and welcome progressive appearance on the Sunday shows, Rep. Maxine Waters bemoans the disconnect between what politicians say we need to focus on and what they're really doing about it:


To tell you the truth, the plight of education in this country is shameful. Just a few days ago I learned that more cities, more states are reducing the number of education days down to four instead of five. And I could not help but stop and think, "Is this America? Is this the country that said and continues to say that education is a top priority?" Why are we not investing more in education? Why do we have dropouts? Why do we have educational systems that are failing? Why is it that we have a situation where many of our young people will not be able to compete in this high technological society because they're not properly educated? And so, no, we do pay lip service to education. We don't really invest in it, and that's got to change. But let me just say this, Americans want to work. This joblessness is not only hitting the middle class, but it is hitting all classes. It is absolutely unconscionable what is happening in the minority communities. When we look at this no jobs haven't been created in August and we find in the African-American community it has increased from 16 percent, 15.9, 16 percent, up now 16.7 percent, and now we're going to talk about cutting government by $1.5 trillion, this new 12 committee membership that we have after the raising the debt ceiling debate? And that means that we're going to lose more jobs, that means more people are going to be unemployed. The African-American rate will probably go up to about 20 percent. I don't know how our country can sustain that kind of...


Of course, David Gregory interrupts her at this point, because Lord know, the plight of the African American community doesn't concern him. But then again, he has the gall to say that we only play lip service to the importance of education. You know, the same guy who only pays lip service to journalism and who spent the better part of the last two years telling his viewers that Americans cared about the deficit when poll after poll proved him a lying hack with a corporate agenda.



No comments:

Post a Comment